Considering
Bible Usage:
- consider used 67 times.
- considered used 16 times.
- Considerest used twice.
- considereth used 9 times.
- considering used 4 times.
- First Reference: Isaiah 57:1
- Last Reference: Hebrews 13:7
Dictionaries:
- Included in Eastons: No
- Included in Hitchcocks: No
- Included in Naves: No
- Included in Smiths: No
- Included in Websters: Yes
- Included in Strongs: Yes
- Included in Thayers: Yes
- Included in BDB: No
Strongs Concordance:
CONSIDERING, participle present tense Fixing the mind on; meditating on; pondering; viewing with care and attention; deliberating on.
Note. We have a peculiar use of this word, which may be a corruption for considered, or which may be a deviation from analogy by an insensible change in the structure of the phrase. It is not possible for us to act otherwise, considering the weakness of our nature. As a participle, this word must here refer to us, or the sentence cannot be resolved by any rule of English syntax. It should be correct to say, It is not possible for us to act otherwise, the weakness of our nature being considered; or We, considering the weakness of our nature, cannot act otherwise. But the latter phrase is better grammar, than it is sense. We use other participles in like manner; as, Allowing for tare, the weight could not be more than a hundred pounds. These and similar phrases are anomalous. But considering is no more a kind of conjunction, in such phrases, than it is a noun.
CONSIDERING, noun The act of deliberating, or carefully attending to; hesitation; as, many mazed considerings.
CONSIDERINGLY, adverb With consideration or deliberation. Whole Duty of Man.
Bible Usage:
- consider used 67 times.
- considered used 16 times.
- Considerest used twice.
- considereth used 9 times.
- considering used 4 times.
- First Reference: Isaiah 57:1
- Last Reference: Hebrews 13:7
Dictionaries:
- Included in Eastons: No
- Included in Hitchcocks: No
- Included in Naves: No
- Included in Smiths: No
- Included in Websters: Yes
- Included in Strongs: Yes
- Included in Thayers: Yes
- Included in BDB: No
Strongs Concordance: